View state supplements to the national underwriting manual.
A “remainder“ is an estate created by an act of the grantor in favor of some person other than the grantor. Remainders are either vested or contingent. A vested right is an immediate right of enjoyment or a fixed right of future enjoyment.Generally, a remainder is vested if it meets both of the following tests:
A vested remainder may be vested either absolutely or defeasibly. An absolute vested remainder is one who is vested in possession unconditionally upon the determination of the particular estate. Example: X, is seized in fee, grants to A and his heirs, but if A dies before B, then to B and his heirs.“Vested remainders” are favored by law. If a remainder is subject to two different interpretations, one of which causes it to be vested and the other one which causes it to be contingent, courts have shown the tendency to select the former interpretation so that the remainder be considered vested. Vested remainders have traditionally been treated on a parity with other estates. They are alienable and devisable.A “contingent remainder” is one where there is an uncertainty either as to the right to the estate, or as to the person entitled to the same, or as to both. A contingent remainder depends on an event or condition which may never happen or be performed.In the grant to A for life, with remainder to A's children, uncertainty does exist as to who will be A's children (if there is any) at the time of A's death.In this case also note that you also have an open class. That is, we don't know who A's children are until A's death.
Vested Remainders
A vested remainder may be transferred to the same extent as any other estate in possession, either by conveyance inter vivos or by will.
Vested remainders have traditionally been treated on a parity with other estates.
Contingent Remainders
A contingent remainder may be subject to
conveyance. Please call a Texas Underwriter before committing to
insure.
Insuring Through a Transfer
Although the significance of
distinctions between vested and contingent remainders has diminished, the
distinction is still important in connection with the application of various
technical rules and most notably the rule against perpetuities (See Rule Against
Perpetuities 17.78). The rule applies to effectively destroy contingent
remainders which violate the rule.
When examining titles to real
property, the need for distinguishing between vested and contingent remainders
frequently arises in situations where title is vested in a life tenant with
remainder over, and the main problem becomes how to convey good title to a
purchaser.
The classic situation where title is vested in A for a life
estate with remainder to B (B having an indefeasible vested remainder) presents
no problems for the conveyance of an absolute estate as long as A and B, either
jointly or be separate instruments, convey their respective interests into the
same party.
Unfortunately, the classic situation constitutes only a
fragment of the possible arrangements pertaining to remainders that may exist.
It is necessary that legal advice be obtained from the Company whenever
remainders are involved in the chain of title of the property to be
insured.